01 / SCREEN
Structured first review
Compare applications against role-linked evidence instead of CV layout, keyword density, or a single opaque score. Unsupported criteria stay visible as unknowns.
Solutions
Stronger shortlists, without another black box.
Rawminds is for recruiting teams that need a clearer basis for screening, interviews, and decisions. It organizes evidence and uncertainty; people remain responsible for the outcome.
Evaluation is for learning how the product fits. Guided access is for a team ready to configure its first role.
Where it helps
Start where your evidence breaks down.
Each workflow begins with explicit role criteria and ends with a human-owned action. Rawminds should make the reason easier to inspect, not simply make the process look automated.
02 / FOCUS
Interview preparation
Turn evidence gaps into questions tied to the role, then attach the answer to the criterion it can actually support.
03 / ALIGN
Reviewer calibration
Keep sources, reviewer input, and disagreements in the same workspace so the team can challenge the basis of a recommendation.
04 / DECIDE
Accountable outcomes
Record the owner, reviewed evidence, reason, and next action. Automation may prepare the work; the hiring team confirms the result.
A grounded evaluation
Bring the messy part of your current process.
A useful walkthrough should test Rawminds against a live role, the information your team already has, and the decision it is struggling to support.
Evaluate one workflow, not a list of claims.
Tell us where the current process loses evidence. We will shape the product walkthrough around that point.